In Their Own Words: Legal Thought Leaders Interview Series

Here we are, a month removed from the ILTA 2010 Conference and for InsideLegal, our biggest takeaway was the re-affirmation of community in the legal technology space and specifically the contributions individual ILTA members and vendors make on an ongoing basis to provide a content and experience-rich environment for all, from the 20 year ILTA veteran to the first timer. In recognition of this dedication, volunteerism, subject matter expertise and intellect, we set out to capture the essence of some of our legal thought leaders … "in their own words". Below are interviews with Joy Heath-Rush, Jonathan Maas, Norm Thomas, Brian Zeve, Bob Tennant, Randi Mayes, Peggy Wechsler, Lance Waagner, Donna Payne, Joseph Scott, Susie Krupa and Brad Sidwell.

[Editors Note: While we have found rich media such as video, podcasts, webcasts and the like to be en vogue, we are still on the fence about the efficacy of these media for our purposes – promoting the legal technology industry and its people. Since we are undecided here, we opted to intermingle old fashioned written content and commentary with concise, informal (albeit Blair Witch style – no, these were not professionally produced) video snippets ranging from 1.5 to 5 minutes in length. In the future, we will increase the quality of these videos. Our goal here was to catch-up with some legal industry leaders to garner impromptu feedback on the 2010 ILTA conference; find out about what they and/or their companies are excited about these days; and finally get their 'off the top of their head' candid insight on thought leadership and what defines thought leaders in our industry]

Joy Heath-Rush – Enterprise Multimedia Services Manager, Sidley Austin

A familiar face, Joy Heath-Rush from Sidley Austin, joined us to recap her ILTA experience as well as her involvement with InsideLegal's annual vendor education program. Unfortunately our trusty camera sort of died in midstream (ironic since Joy is the Enterprise Multimedia Services Manager for Sidley Austin) so you'll need to go to ILTA TV if you want to see Joy in full color. We revisited some of the points that Joy made during the panel when it came to selling to law firms and specifically asked her about the best ways to work with her from a vendor standpoint. We also drilled down into the RFP process because this is something that we're seeing more and more vendors spend a lot of resources responding to. This led to the question of who is actually driving the RFP process and where are they coming from? Joy made an interesting observation that a lot of the RFPs currently being issued are being driven by be the e-discovery market and specifically the need for discovery solutions by law firms. Also, based on the fact that there are so many vendors providing e-discovery services, RFPs are a way of managing that process. Lastly, we talked with Joy about the pure networking nature of ILTA and the importance of legal vendors establishing relationships, building credibility and earning members' trust and loyalty.

Jonathan Maas – Assistant Director, Ernst & Young

After Joy, we had a chance to catch up with Jonathan Maas, 30 year litigation support industry and litigation technology veteran, and current assistant director of Ernst & Young's Forensic Technology & Discovery Services team in London. Jonathan, who spoke at several ILTA sessions and attended several others, made an interesting, perhaps even controversial, point (controversy?! all in a day's work for Mr. Maas) related to cloud computing. Specifically, he thought it was sort of peculiar that cloud computing is this huge buzzword and clearly the number one show topic but in his mind, he really didn't see the difference between cloud computing and software-as-a-service and other web-enabled delivery methods for technologies and services. His point being that there is virtually no differentiation or anything that sets cloud computing apart from what's already being done aside from an updated catch-phrase. His point reminded us of our recent legal cloud computing interview with Microsoft's Norm Thomas and his statement that Microsoft has been involved in cloud development for the past 15 years but not many consumers realize that because it wasn't called cloud computing back then and it did not apply to highly visible consumer services.

Brian Zeve & Norm Thomas – Director & Manager, Microsoft Professional Services

On the heals of InsideLegal's recent interview with Norm Thomas focused on Microsoft's legal cloud strategy, we wanted to catch up with Norm and his colleague Brian Zeve, who leads the charge for Microsoft's legal vertical efforts, to collect their thoughts on legal futures; Microsoft's commitment to the legal industry; and also explore to what extent the cloud 'rubber' has hit the road for the company. With the cloud topic being hot and very apropos for Microsoft, we asked Brian to share Microsoft's top benefits of cloud delivery versus others. While most of his answers (cost savings and infrastructure consolidation/streamlining) reflected industry standards, his bigger point about the significance of increased collaboration and interoperability was our biggest take-away. On the topic of thought leadership, Brian believes having a business vision, as well as the ability to identify and overcome future obstacles, before they become show stoppers, are critical ingredients.   

Bob Tennant – CEO, Recommind

Next we caught up with Bob Tennant, Recommind's CEO, to talk about his impressions of ILTA 2010, information governance, its increasing relevance in the legal eDiscovery space, as well as the launch of the company's predictable costs in eDiscovery initiative based on its Predictive Coding technology. According to the company's ILTA release, the Axcelerate Review & Analysis solution (based on predictive coding) allows law firms to offer fixed-fee arrangements for document review, a major breakthrough in the industry's ongoing efforts to better predict and reign in eDiscovery costs. On the topic of thought leadership, Bob mentioned the importance of forward thinking and compared it to hockey, stating the desire to move to where the puck will be, versus where it currently is. 

Randi Mayes & Peggy Wechsler – Executive Director & Program Director, ILTA

What would an interview session be without talking to the energetic go-getters who coolly orchestrate the ILTA conference year after year … Randi Mayes, ILTA's Executive Director and Peggy Wechsler, ILTA's Program Director. While Randi focused her video snippet on how vendor partners can work with the organization on providing members with content and thought leadership via the various publication and media vehicles, Peggy provided an insider's view on final attendance numbers, vendor participation and 2011 conference location details (Nashville!). One of the key points, gleaned from both Peggy's and Randi's comments on thought leadership, was the importance of commitment to legal and the energy, sacrifice and time it takes to establish credibility and earn respect within the ILTA community.   

Lance Waagner – CEO, Intelliteach

We caught up with Lance Waagner, CEO of Intelliteach and former CIO of Atlanta-based Kilpatrick Stockton, who had just wrapped up a successfully panel session focused on helpdesk and deskside support. The session, which he co-presented with Tony Hartsfield and Franklin Stevens of Bryan Cave, drew 135 law firm support managers and user services personnel looking for practical ways to provide better helpdesk support while increasing analyst morale and keeping user satisfaction high. In fact, Lance's video snippet speaks to the Guru's Guide he and his analysts developed in order to provide law firms with heldpdesk statistics and metrics in order to help measure satisfaction and helpdesk efficacy.

Donna Payne – CEO & Founder, PayneGroup

A short time later, Donna Payne joined us and continued the thought leadership conversation we first kicked off earlier in the week during the vendor education program's legal thought leadership panel discussion. Donna, who juggled running PayneGroup's booth with four speaking slots during the conference, is an ILTA fixture, not only as a valued and trusted vendor partner, but also as a peer and thought leader to the entire ILTA membership. Whether she is travelling the country as part of ILTA's Office 2010 presentation tour or having one-on-one technology conversations with leading firms' managing partners, Donna has always applied the right mix of subject matter expertise, industry knowledge and straight-up business acumen. 

Joseph Scott – Vice President & General Manager, CompuLaw/Deadlines on Demand

Joseph Scott, GM of legal calendaring solution provider CompuLaw and Deadlines On Demand, took time out from an extremely busy CompuLaw booth to share his ILTA experience. It was good to hear Joseph reiterate 'the economy has rebounded' message and talk about loosening purse strings of large firms pursuing calendaring and docketing solutions. Joseph, who spends much of his time speaking with firm risk managers and attorneys throughout the country about the malpractice risk associated with calendar and deadline-related errors, provided a unique slant on our thought leadership themed question. Specifically, he identified thought leaders as those that ask questions no one has asked before and in turn pursue answers. Asking those 'wow, I never thought of that' questions according to Scott is a lot more important and impressive than 'talk leaders' who repeat what others have already espoused before them.  

Susie Krupa – Industry Principal, Professional Services, SAP America

We were delighted to spend a few minutes with Susie Krupa who shared with us what SAP and its professional services vertical partner, Tata Consulting Services, are up to in legal and also gave us an insider's view on the G100 Global CIO Forum, a meeting of the world's top law firm CIOs, which occurs on ILTA day one. Susie represented SAP as part of a G100 financial management panel discussion (along with Microsoft, Elite and Aderant) and talked about how the global company's leadership and track record in other professional services (such as accounting) can go a long way in helping law firms embrace and adopt future technologies that will define their organizations 5-10 years from now.

Brad Sidwell – Vice President & General Manager, LexisNexis InterAction

One of our last interviewees at conference was Brad Sidwell, responsible for LexisNexis Interaction. Brad shared with us InterAction's big ILTA conference news – the release of InterAction 6.0 for Microsoft Outlook and corresponding positive ILTA attendee feedback, and had a lot of fresh perspectives to share on legal technology, the ILTA community and thought leadership. In terms of the big product news, Brad, the former CIO of Troutman Sanders, also shared with us his company's core product principals, no doubt critical in the development of InterAction 6.0. Specifically, he cited increasing CRM user adoption rates (which they hope to achieve via common workflow within Outlook); renewed focus on partnerships, specifically Microsoft; and embracing Office as a platform (vs. an application) and as such being able to embed InterAction services/functionality within the new framework.

While ILTA 2011 is roughly 11 months away, the news, views, and insights shared by our legal thought leader interviewees can be put to use now and reflected upon over the next year. While it is commendable to occasionally focus on specific technology themes (cloud, virtualization, etc.), the topic of thought leadership, and the subjects broached by those we consider 'thought leading', will be shared and commented on by InsideLegal for a long time to come. 

Posted in "In Their Own Words" Spotlights, Consultants, ILTA, Law Firm Leaders, Legal Industry, People, Thought Leadership, Vendors | Leave a comment

Podcasts & Coverage of the 2010 ILTA Member Technology Purchasing Survey

We had the opportunity to speak with many industry editors and blogs/podcasts about the 2010 InsideLegal/ILTA Member Technology Purchasing Survey. Below are a few…

ILTA TV

ILTA TV For the past two years, ILTA has provided ILTA TV during the annual conference. For those not able to attend the conference, ILTA TV Live is the perfect way to tune-in for a live video broadcast, or easily access the recording after the conference. ILTA TV is again hosted by ii3 Inc. CEO Shy Alter. InsideLegal's JoAnna Forshee was interviewed by Shy and you can find the recording here. Also check out other interviews by industry thought leaders such as Joy Heath Rush, Judi Flournoy, Brian Zeve, Donna Payne, Marty Metz, Ron Friedman and John Alber (just to name a few). Thanks to Shy and ILTA! 

The Kennedy-Mighell Report

The Kennedy-Mighell Report PodcastThe latest podcast of legal technology superstars, Dennis Kennedy and Tom Mighell, focuses on "Geolocation: Where Everyone Knows Your Name AND Location". In their parting shots segment, Dennis and Tom highlight the 2010 InsideLegal/ILTA Member Technology Purchasing Survey as the "best resource available for getting hard data on what law firms are actually doing in the area of legal technology". Thanks Dennis and Tom!  Download the podcast here and subscribe to The Kennedy-Mighell Report on iTunes.

The Un-Billable Hour with Rodney Dowell

The Un-Billable HourJoAnna Forshee & Jobst Elster of InsideLegal were the guests on The Un-Billable Hour podcast with Rodney Dowell to discuss the highlights and budget data from the 2010 ILTA Member Technology Purchasing Survey. Thanks Rodney!   Download the podcast here and subscribe to The Un-Billable Hour on iTunes.

[Both The Kennedy-Mighell Report and The Un-Billable Hour are part of the Legal Talk Network.]

Legal Current

LegalCurrentInsideLegal's Head of Content, Jobst Elster, was interviewed by Kevin Hunt, Editor of LegalCurrent.com, the blog from Thomson Reuters.Thanks to Kevin and Angie from LegalCurrent.com!  You can view the post and video here and subscribe to the blog for updates at LegalCurrent.com.

Posted in Consultants, ILTA, Market Research, Media, People, Social Media, Thought Leadership | Leave a comment

Not your average ILTA session…ILTA Vendor Education Program Addresses Legal Technology Vendor/Consultant Needs

InsideLegal/ILTA Vendor Education Program The dust has slowly settled on an ILTA educational conference that not only ended with a bang (a la the inaugural ILTA Distinguished Peer Awards), but overall proved that NOTHING compares to this 4 1/2 day extravaganza of legal technology education, demonstrations and networking. The vendor education program, which has kicked off ILTA day one (Monday) for the past 7 years, proved, more than ever, that ‘if you build it, they shall come’. In our case, as perennial producers of this program, this translated to tailoring educational sessions based on exhibiting vendor feedback; assembling bright, reputable, and established legal technology panelists; and filling a room with 85+ legal technology vendor and consultancy decision makers including CEOs, GMs, marketing and sales excutives, and technology product managers.    

Peggy Wechsler Kicking off the Vendor Program with the Business Meeting The three and a half hour vendor education program kicked-off, as in previous years, with ILTA’s Vendor Business Meeting, followed by a Working with ILTA (beyond the annual conference) session led by ILTA’s Program Director Peggy Wechsler and Executive Director Randi Mayes. Peggy began by thanking all the exhibitors and consultants for supporting ILTA throughout the years and particularly during the conference’s move from Nashville to Las Vegas this year. The great news was then shared that member attendance for 2010 was approximately 1,130 – indicating a 30% increase from 2009! That definitely set the stage for a high energy week. Last but not least, Peggy introduced the ILTA Board Members, Conference Committee and staff that were able to be there. Angela Roarke, Advertising Sales Coordinator, was brought up to speak about getting the most out of the exhibitors sponsorships and new opportunities to get involved with ILTA’s publications through advertising. [Editors Note: Randi Mayes spoke to Jobst and me about her initiative to incorporate more rich media into ILTA’s publications. Randi is very excited about including more audio, video and social media within their publications’ content and is looking to the vendor community for ideas to help push the envelope here. This is a great chance to get involved and stand out!] 

Advice for Selling to Law Firms The meat of our discussion started with the Advice for Selling to Law Firms session, which we first included last year based on vendor feedback. The panel was designed to give vendor executives and vendor sales folks an insider’s view into what works and what doesn’t work when selling to their law firm clients and prospects.

In order to make this a real worthwhile experience, we brought back Joy Heath-Rush, Enterprise Multimedia Services Manager at Sidley Austin and ILTA’s past President, (who served on this inaugural panel last year) and added Scott Christensen, IT Director of Wildman Harrold, and current ILTA president. Joy and Scott are both technology decision makers for their law firms; in Joy’s case a top 20 global law firm and in Scott’s case a 200-attorney national firm. We asked a variety of questions related to the sales process and how vendors can most effectively work with them.

Both panelists continually stressed that building direct relationships with them directly is critical to any sort of success they might have selling (versus contacting their boss or others first). Contrary to popular belief, cold calling is an effective tool if utilized properly and respectfully. Joy made a point to say that if she does take a cold call, which she regularly does, she’ll be more inclined to follow-up if she knows how long the introduction will be. For example, if she gets a cold call saying “I’d like to setup a 15 minute call to introduce you to our product”, she is more likely to accept. She also urged vendors to be very clear about their intentions and not to over-promise or under-deliver, especially in the beginning of the sales process.

The session, which was very interactive with many questions coming from the audience, included other tips as well as “dos and don’ts”, mostly focused on education and common sense business conduct:

  • The panelists talked about the importance of being able to not only walk the walk in legal but also talk the talk. Specifically, they both said that it’s very important to understand legal speak so if you’re not a legal specific vendor, educate yourself on legal jargon, how law firms work and operate, their workflows, etc.  For example, the point was made, that anyone who refers to legal customers, as opposed to clients, evidently does not understand legal speak.
  • Also, educate yourself on the legal technologies that a law firm relies on. Understand the technology infrastructure, how IT is structured, the importance of the IT department, and the overall selling process.
  • Do your homework on the firm and the organizational structure within the firm. Treat the sales process like an interview; with all the online tools at your disposal and with the advent of social media, there’s really no excuse to not be fully informed before making that first phone call.
  • The legal community is very loyal so once vendors have established a solid reputation and earned respect from their law firm clients, future business opportunities are a natural progression of the relationship.
  • Understand law firms’ purchasing and procurement processes. Increasingly, larger, global law firms follow a formalized, centralized purchasing process for everything from tissue paper to servers and enterprise software solutions. So, while vendors may have relationships with one particular decision maker or influencer, there may be many more layers to uncover as it relates to firm-wide purchasing buy-in. On the other hand, smaller firms (i.e., Wildman Harrold) direct technology purchasing through the IT Group and give IT Directors (such as Scott Christensen) direct and final purchasing influence and decision making ability. The bottom-line: It’s vital to identify and understand the legal target audience, from influencer to final decision-maker.
  • Peer networking and peer recommendations are the key factors in law firm technology decision-making. As a legal technology peer networking organization, ILTA enables members to seek out each other’s recommendations and experiences, critical aspects to comprehensively evaluating and purchasing technologies and related services. 

Thought Leadership - How to Attain It & How to Maintain It Up next was the session topic that received the most votes from the ILTA exhibitors – Vendor Thought Leadership, with a focus on how to establish it & maintain it. This particular topic has been near and dear to InsideLegal’s heart for some time, and truly one of the core reasons we initiated the InsideLegal forum and blog as a means of promoting legal technologists regardless of their heritage (including vendors, consultants, law firm leaders, etc.). While we have long preached thought leadership (as opposed to blatant selling and promoting), the ILTA education session served as our kick-off to an ongoing initiative focused on not only educating vendors and others on the attributes and qualities of legal thought leaders, but also providing a forum for thought leader ‘work product’ if you will. While assembling the thought leader panel, we didn’t waste time in reaching out to who we consider to be one of the poster children for legal vendor thought leadership … Donna Payne. A well respected and experienced public speaker, author and legal technologist, Donna has managed the extremely difficult task of separating herself (and her expertise) from the successful vendor company (PayneGroup) she operates. During the discussion, JoAnna highlighted the importance of industry involvement, commitment to the industry and to organizations such as ILTA, and fine line between espousing subject matter expertise and shamelessly promoting vendor products and services. While Donna talked about the importance of integrity and honesty in paving the way for long term thought leadership, the group also came to the conclusion that there is still a stark bias and mis-conception when it comes to promoting vendors as thought leaders. Stay tuned for more content on this topic on InsideLegal (including exclusive legal thought leader video interviews filmed during the ILTA conference).

PR Doesn't Stand for Press Release Continuing the theme of ‘thoughtful’ education, we next presented our public relations-themed session PR Doesn’t Stand for Press Release focused on the components of a successful PR (read Public Relations) campaign (view presentation here). Again, this topic was voted on by the attendees pre-conference and was designed to help everyone from a vendor CEO to a marketing manager to a consultant understand what PR can and can’t do for their company; what steps can be taken to engage clients in the proactive PR process; and how a focus on education and thought leadership can help establish meaningful relationships with the legal (traditional and social) media. The biggest take-away from the presentation was the continued relevance of developing client-focused content such as user case studies and client testimonials. As revealed earlier in the day during the Advice for Selling to Law Firms session (and mirrored in the 2010 ILTA Member Technology Purchasing Survey), peer recommendations and examples of other firms’ technology best practices and implementations remain the top influences when it comes to legal technology purchases.

Leveraging Web 2.0/Social Media to reach Your Prospects No modern legal conference would be complete without the almost obligatory social media/web 2.0 session so it was appropriate that the Leveraging Web 2.0/Social Media to Reach Your Prospects topic throughout the day, the primary goal was to make it relevant and valuable for legal technology vendors, in this instance ranging from those who have never tweeted to others who actively use a variety of social media tools to enhance their marketing communication efforts. The social media faculty included InsideLegal’s JoAnna Forshee (Twitter @InsideLegal), a regular presenter and educator on the topic of social media, Donna Payne of PayneGroup (Twitter @donna_payne) and Rob Robinson, VP of Marketing for Orange Legal Technologies (Twitter @complexd). While many of the basics were covered in a similar session at last year’s conference, attendee feedback indicated a desire to dive into the details of how various social media tools can be better leveraged. Rob for example shared his philosophy of using social media to provide value to his audiences including twitter followers, LinkedIn group subscribers or those that regularly read his blog posts. He talked about his controversial (but successful) strategy of including all industry news relevant to his readers – including that of his competitors. [Editors Note: Rob wrote an excellent social media strategy article for Peer to Peer. Check it out here.] In addition to providing and adding value, the panel emphasized the ability to use twitter and LinkedIn to engage in conversations, gain valuable client and industry feedback, but also leverage various tracking tools to monitor what others are saying about topics and themes of interest to vendors.

2010 InsideLegal/ILTA Member Technology Purchasing SurveyThe vendor program concluded with the annual presentation by Jobst Elster of the annual InsideLegal/ILTA’s Member Technology Purchasing Survey. The 2010 survey, which was administered by ILTA and analyzed and published by InsideLegal, focused on feedback from ILTA member law firms with 50 or more attorneys and covered IT budgeting; technology purchasing patterns; selection criteria and influencers; technology trends & IT challenges, and state-of-the-economy questions. The 7th annual survey yielded a new high 18% response rate – 109 unique firm responses ranging from 50 to over 3,000 attorneys. A complete survey summary and commentary can be found here.

In closing, InsideLegal truly appreciates the opportunity to continually collaborate with ILTA on producing the annual vendor education program and is always looking for feedback and suggestions to improve session content for future programs. Please send any ideas and comments to JoAnna Forshee. Remember, marketing to the ILTA membership is something you should be doing all year round, not just at the Annual Conference. Start now and you’ll be ahead of the game by the 2011 ILTA Annual Conference, August 21-25 at the (newly renovated) Gaylord Opryland Hotel in Nashville.

Posted in Events, ILTA, InsideLegal Courses, Legal Industry, Market Research, Marketing, Media, PR, Social Media, Speaking Opportunities, Surveys, Thought Leadership, Vendors | Leave a comment

2010 InnovAction Award Winners Announced

Innovaction The College of Law Practice Management (COLPM) has announced the winners of the 2010 InnovAction Awards. The InnovAction Awards is a worldwide search for lawyers, law firms, and other deliverers of legal services who are currently engaged in some extraordinarily innovative efforts. The goal is to demonstrate to the legal community what can be created when passionate professionals, with big ideas and strong convictions, are determined to make a difference. 

Pro Bono Net, a national nonprofit organization working to increase access to justice, is the 2010 recipient of the coveted InnovAction Award from the College of Law Practice Management, while New York-based legal services provider Axiom received the InnovAction Honorable Mention Award.

2010 InnovAction Award-Winning Entry

Pro Bono Net Pro Bono Net was selected for its “LawHelp Interactive” initiative, which provides a national infrastructure for online legal document assembly and helps tens of thousands of low-income people each year to complete needed legal forms. LawHelp Interactive was launched in 2005 with support from the Legal Services Corporation, and was used last year to complete nearly 150,000 civil court forms covering such critical areas as child support, protection orders for victims of domestic violence, consumer debt and eviction. LawHelp Interactive increases efficiency for legal aid programs, allowing more people to be helped in less time. It also removes barriers to pro bono participation by making it easier for attorneys to work in areas of law where they may lack experience, and by allowing them to spend less time on tedious paperwork and more time interacting with clients.

2010 InnovAction Honorable Mention

Axiom Axiom was selected for its “Function Outsourcing” initiative. Axiom’s ability to deliver complex, highly coordinated function outsourcing arrangements result in significant cost savings and notable efficiency benefits for clients. For example, an existing Axiom client found itself under significant cost pressure in 2008. After thoroughly analyzing the client’s workflow, Axiom was able to scope out a sustainable solution on a fixed-fee basis in which half of the client’s technology contracts department was outsourced to Axiom. Unlike many traditional outside counsel providers, the Axiom team delivered transparency to the client, was able to contract or expand in size depending on demand flow, and delivered metrics and efficiency strategies that the client implemented as “best practices” throughout its entire operation.

Each year (since 2005), the COLPM presents the coveted InnovAction Awards to those unsung heroes and rising stars within the legal profession who dare to think differently and succeed by doing so.  The COLPM is an organization that was "founded to recognize distinguished law practice management professionals, to set standards of achievement for others in the profession, and to fund and assist projects that enhance the highest quality of law practice management."

The awards will be presented on Saturday, October 23, at a special session during the 2010 Futures Conference & Symposium, held in conjunction with the Annual Meeting of the College of Law Practice Management in Washington, DC.

InsideLegal is a 
Friend of InnovAction

Posted in Industry Awards | Leave a comment

Pam Woldow joins Edge International

Pam Woldrow We received an announcement from Jordan Furlong that Pam Woldow has joined Edge International as partner and general counsel. According to Jordan, Pam is "one of the world’s top legal consultants and an unparalleled expert in legal project management and alternative fee arrangements. Pam’s written work includes some of the most incisive commentary available on AFAs and project management in the legal services marketplace, and her accomplishments and observations have received much legal media attention."

Edge is also announcing Pam's new blog At The Intersection and she will continue her Twitter feed at @pwoldow.

Posted in Consultants, People | Leave a comment

2010 ILTA Member Technology Purchasing Survey: A Year to Remember

2010 InsideLegal/ILTA Member Technology Purchasing Survey InsideLegal and the International Legal Technology Association (ILTA) recently released the findings of the 7th annual ILTA Member Technology Purchasing Survey (survey). The 2010 survey, which was administered by ILTA and analyzed and published by InsideLegal, focused on feedback from ILTA member law firms with 50 or more attorneys and covered IT budgeting; technology purchasing patterns; selection criteria and influencers; technology trends & IT challenges, and state-of-the-economy questions. The survey, considered by leading legal technologist Dennis Kennedy as the "best resource available for getting hard data on what law firms are actually doing in the area of legal technology", has continued to gain in relevance in our space. The 2010 edition, complete with 43 questions (including 10 new items from last year), was distributed to approximately 610 ILTA member firms, ranging from 50 to 3,000 attorneys, and yielded 109 unique firm responses. 84% of all participating firms came from the U.S., with the remaining 16% originating from Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand and Brazil. 

2010 survey highlights included:

Budgeting & PurchasingOverall firm technology spending as a percentage of firm revenue is still down, but slowly rebounding. Key indicators including 'percentage of firm revenue spent on technology' and 'per attorney tech spend' are still far below 2008 levels, but showing promise compared to 2009 levels.

IT budgets growing: Budget belts have definitely been loosened as evidenced by 33% more firms indicating technology budget increases vs. 2009. Firms with growing tech budgets cited an average budget increase of 11%.

The new financial 'normal': 45% reported their firms are already 'back to normal financially', while only 6% indicated it will take another 12+ months (compared to 45% in 2009). Of course, being back to 'normal' beckons the question, 'normal compared to what?'

Technology purchase approval shift: 2010 percentages reflect a shift away from the majority of tech approvals coming from C-Level Executives (41% compared to 52% in 2009), to more authority being given to IT Directors and Firm Administrators.

Technology purchases – past & future: 2009 legal technology implementations were predominantly focused on core hardware and IT infrastructure projects including network and server upgrades, desktops/laptops/notebooks and storage area networks. 43% of all respondents (representing the highest percentage) are planning Microsoft Office upgrades in 2010/2011. According to legal IT and firm end-users, satisfaction with newly implemented technologies is down from previous years.

Purchasing influencer/influences: The finance department has firmly asserted itself in the legal technology purchasing process and purchase requests from attorneys are up 16% since 2007.

Popular legal and technology publications read by ILTA members include Peer to Peer magazine, ILTA whitepapers, CIO Magazine, Law Technology News, Information Week and Computerworld. Technology articles, 'how tos', best practices, product reviews and case studies are the most popular content sections. While blog readership among survey respondents is up 13%, technology podcasts are still a low priority, and LinkedIn is the most popular social media tool with a 83% use rate.

As expected, IT colleague and firm peer recommendations were the top factors for technology buying decisions in 2010, followed by internet research and input from ILTA E-Groups. 57% of survey respondents indicated using an outside consultant to assist in making purchasing decisions.

Technology trends and IT challenges: 17% of responding firms indicated implementing a cloud strategy this year, compared to 9% in 2009. Email is the top cloud service respondents are looking to deploy followed by case and practice management. Primary benefits firms are looking for from cloud solutions include increased backup, reduced infrastructure costs, and scalability.

Collaboration: 49% of respondents utilize SharePoint internally for collaboration, while 24% use it as a collaboration tool for client and other external communications.

IT challenges: The biggest challenges facing legal IT departments include email management, staffing issues and storage needs.

Vendor relations: 69% of all survey respondents were offered vendor discounts last year, with 20% receiving free services from their technology vendors.

You can download the complete 2010 InsideLegal/ILTA Member Technology Purchasing Survey here.

2010 survey related resources:

A look back to 2009's survey:

Posted in ILTA, Legal Industry, Market Research, Surveys | Leave a comment

ILTA 2010 Inaugural Distinguished Peer Award Winners Announced

2010 ILTA Distinguished Peer Awards

(Stay tuned for InsideLegal's full ILTA 2010 recap…)

Earlier this year, ILTA announced an annual recognition program titled ILTA’s Distinguished Peer Awards. The inaugural ceremony was held the last night of ILTA 2010 at the Aria Resort in Las Vegas on Thursday, August 26th. 

InsideLegal has posted photos of the event [click here to view]. Please note our photos are not the best quality and ILTA will be releasing professional photos. In the meantime, feel free to enjoy ours!

The 'ILTA Awards Dinner – Live from Las Vegas' was the icing on the conference cake, wrapping up four and a half days of educational sessions, dozens of social and networking events, and literally hundreds of vendor exhibit demonstrations and product showcases. Prior to the Peer Awards presentation, dinner guests (including all registered conference attendees and a smaller selection of exhibitors and consultant pass holders) enjoyed an amazing three course meal and the comical banter of Jan McInnis, comedienne and professional speaker. While McInnis played the part of awards emcee, various ILTA board members and conference chairs presented the 19 awards spanning individual peer recognition as well as vendor and organizational awards. 

Specifically, the inaugural ILTA Distinguished Peer Awards program was created to honor the achievements of ILTA members who are making technology work for the legal profession. The program recognizes those who have delivered great business value and transformational impact through their innovations and implementations or have been champions in specific areas of focus for their organizations. You can read more background about each award on the Awards page

Here are the 2010 ILTA Distinguished Peer Awards Nominees and Winners:

ORGANIZATION AWARDS

Innovative Member of the Year

  • Mayer Brown LLP – Electronic Balloting
  • Mayer Brown LLP – Merger & Combination Playbook
  • Bradford & Barthel, LLP – Google Apps Collaboration *WINNER

Project of the Year

  • Bingham McCutchen
  • Fish & Richardson, P.C.
  • McInnis Cooper *WINNER

SharePoint Innovator of the Year

  • Dickinson Wright PLLC
  • Miller Johnson
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP *WINNER

INDIVIDUAL AWARDS

ADERANT Champion 

  • Lin Yang – Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, P.L.C.
  • Jeff Olson – Ulmer & Berne LLP *WINNER


Infrastructure Technologies Champion

  • Carlos Rodriguez – Nexsen Pruet, LLC
  • Jason Najacht – Mayer Brown LLP
  • Dean Leung – Davis LLP *WINNER

Knowledge Management Champion

  • Tom Baldwin – Reed Smith LLP
  • Meredith Williams – Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz
  • Eric Hunter – Bradford & Barthel, LLP *WINNER

Law Department Champion 

  • Risa Schwartz – Cisco Systems, Inc. *WINNER

Litigation Support Champion

  • Duane Lites – Jackson Walker L.L.P. *WINNER
  • Joanne Lane – MetLife
  • Julie Brown – Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP

Marketing Technology Champion 

  • Kristyn Sornat – Much Shelist Denenberg Ament & Rubenstein, P.C. *WINNER

Microsoft Champion

  • Beau Mersereau – Fish & Richardson, P.C. *WINNER


Mobile, Remote and Wireless Champion

  • Drew Collier – Polsinelli Shughart PC *WINNER

Open Source Software Champion 

  • David Nevala – Lukins & Annis PS *WINNER

Open Text Champion 

  • Brook Lee – Fox Rothschild LLP  *WINNER

Practice Management Champion 

  • Michelle Mahoney – Mallesons *WINNER

Project Management Champion 

  • Jennifer Potter – Fish & Richardson, P.C. *WINNER

User Support Champion

  • Maritta Terrell – Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C.
  • Denise Ash – Robinson & McElwee PLLC *WINNER
  • Chris Myatt – Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP

REGION OF THE YEAR

  • Europe
  • Middle Atlantic
  • North Atlantic
  • North Central
  • South Central
  • North Pacific
  • South Atlantic
  • South Pacific *WINNER

VENDOR AWARDS 

Innovative Vendor Award

  • Guidance Software *WINNER
  • iManage Universal Search
  • IntApp, Inc.
  • Omega Legal Systems, Inc.
  • Rosslyn Analytics

Technology Implementation of the Year

  • Datacert, Inc. *Winner
  • DocAuto, Inc.
  • Recommind

InsideLegal would like to congratulate all the award winners and thank ILTA for an incredible event – they always manage to top themselves. Kudos to Randi Mayes, Peggy Wechsler, TJ Johnson, Ken Hansen and the entire conference team – this was our 11th ILTA Conference and it was the best!

Posted in ILTA, Industry Awards, Law Firm Leaders | Leave a comment

InsideLegal News ILTA Special Edition #1 – Vendor Announcements

ILTA 2010: Over 300 vendors, most with lots to say. Here are some of their announcements this year.. 

Posted in ILTA, Legal Industry, Vendors | Leave a comment

2010 InsideLegal/ILTA Member Technology Purchasing Survey

Hot off the press!  Today we released the findings of the 2010 InsideLegal/ILTA Member Technology Purchasing Survey. The 43 question web-based survey was distributed to approximately 610 ILTA member firms, ranging from 50 to 3,000 attorneys, and yielded 109 unique firm responses.

Posted in ILTA, Market Research | Leave a comment

“In Their Own Words”: Microsoft’s Legal Cloud Computing Strategy: Not ‘All or Nothing’

Cloud computing is without a doubt the biggest 2010 technology trend, buzzword, initiative, pipedream … not only in legal, but across any number of verticals. Call it what you may, but with every mention of
Microsoft“we’re going to the cloud”, comes the chatter from naysayers who claim cloud alternatives are not yet proven, not yet widely available, and definitely not viable for large scale, enterprise level, business use. Enter Microsoft, who with a 15 year track record of delivering cloud solutions, is still being pulled into the "not yet ready for prime time/unproven" debate.   

Norm Thomas - Microsoft’s Industry Market Development Director, Legal Industry Solutions So, in order to more accurately understand what legal hosted services Microsoft is currently offering, how these complement and/or enhance its proven desktop suites, and why there is a viable Redmond-based alternative to Google Apps after all, InsideLegal opted to go straight to the source and chat with Norm Thomas, Microsoft’s Industry Market Development Director, Legal Industry Solutions.

Those who have been following Microsoft’s steady move into legal within the last decade undoubtedly have heard of or seen Norm at major legal industry events including ILTA’s Annual Conference, LegalTech, ABA TECHSHOW and ALA’s Annual Conference. Along with Brian Zeve, his boss and Managing Director for Microsoft’s U.S. Professional Services Industry, Norm has been expertly carrying the company’s legal enterprise strategy torch and seeking honest feedback from legal IT thought leaders and firm decision makers. 

Our conversation comes on the heels of our coverage of Bradford & Barthel's move to Google Apps that beckoned the question, “What is Microsoft doing in the legal cloud, and why don’t we know about it?” In response to that coverage, several InsideLegal readers posted comments and wrote in with questions related to Microsoft’s scope of cloud services, specific functionality, licensing and security concerns, and broader business and legal vertical strategy inquiries.

Here’s InsideLegal's exclusive Q&A with Norm:

PRODUCTS: LEGAL CLOUD SOLUTIONS, FEATURES AND FUNCTIONS

IL: Please provide some background on Microsoft’s cloud offerings and clearly articulate what is available now. What will be coming later? And when?

NT: Microsoft has been in the cloud for more than 15 years now and our cloud services are pretty diverse. You mentioned that a lot of people are familiar with Google and that’s because that is what they use at home. Our cloud services include Hotmail, launched 17 years ago, with 350 million users, Xbox Live with more than 6 million active accounts and even Windows Update services date back to Windows 2000 and XP. So when people ask if we’re doing this to catch up, we like to point them to this strong history. Overall, cloud-based services offer Microsoft almost as many benefits as they do to law firms. And while our biggest competitor for new user acquisition is previous versions of Office and Windows, we see that making the move to the cloud addresses a lot of upgrade bottlenecks and concerns. Specifically, the ease of migration, upgrade and deployment in the cloud environment has made a big difference for users and IT.

With respect to the legal industry, we have offerings that allow customers to take advantage of cloud computing on their terms, meaning that we deliver software, tools and guidance that enable them to realize the benefits of cloud computing with the reliability and security of on premises software. One is Windows Azure, focused on developers and software development in the cloud, and the other is Microsoft Online Services – Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, Office Communications Online, Dynamics CRM Online, etc. – that makes it easy for law firms to leverage and rapidly deploy familiar Microsoft products as flexible services. 

These Online Services essentially give you various deployment options – run it on the server, run it in the cloud or on the client. With Office Web Apps, the browser experience will be lighter but requires no additional training and speaks to our approach that you don’t have to put all or nothing in the cloud. While we have trouble imagining fee earners editing 400 page commercial lease agreements through a browser, there will be hybrid scenarios where certain workloads are out in the cloud and others remain on the desktop. On top of that, all this is also enabled on mobile devices so there’s no new user experience and associated learning curve. The changes to the end user are invisible. 

IL: Why is there the general market perception that Microsoft is playing cloud "catch-up" and lagging behind other, more agile players (even if just perceived) like Google?

NT: The entire industry’s IT mentality needs to expand and understand the cloud is not an “all or nothing” proposition. And, Microsoft is already handling certain workloads out in the cloud (virus scanning, spam filtering, archiving, DMS data stores) and developing hybrid options in many other areas.

In many respects, we are all collectively going to be staring down the barrel of a gun if we take the entire law firm infrastructure and the desktop environment and expect attorneys to be satisfied using only the browser. What Microsoft says is, "software is software." You can run it anywhere you choose, whatever makes the most sense for your firm. If you want to take parts of your messaging environment and put it out on the cloud, you can do that on our data center, keep it on premise as most firms do now, or work with a Microsoft partner’s data center, or even turn your own server farm into the firm’s private cloud data center. This scenario might be a good solution for firms that are in a consolidation phase and are looking to streamline server infrastructure. In doing so, legal IT can alleviate a great deal of costs, inefficiencies and create what we call economies of skill, by freeing up internal resources in the operations and maintenance environments. 

IL: What was made available this year in May when Office 2010 was launched to all business customers? 

NT: In May, Microsoft introduced Office 2010 and SharePoint 2010. Included in this launch was Microsoft Office Web Apps, the online companions to Word, PowerPoint, Excel and OneNote. Office Web Apps allow users to work from virtually anywhere, providing easy access to documents while preserving the look and feel of a document regardless of device. So, all the applications are all available with an Internet connection and "deskless" workers can access apps from a SharePoint cloud for example. Again, Microsoft is truly committed to the cloud and is taking all the knowledge gained from 15 years of cloud development and making all its products feature compatible no matter where they are located. Currently, 70% of Microsoft’s 40,000 employees who are involved in building software are working on entirely cloud-based or cloud-inspired projects; this will be 90% by the end of this year.

IL: How does the Office Web Apps/online feature set compare to the familiar Office desktop? 

NT: In general, use of the Office desktop applications is not required to use the Office Web Apps. However, many common usage scenarios will involve use of the Web Apps in conjunction with the desktop apps – using Office Web Apps for fast, lightweight editing and easy sharing, and using the desktop applications for deeper editing and full functionality. Microsoft Office Web Apps are the free online companions to the Microsoft Office Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote applications that you already use. They enable you to access and edit your documents from virtually anywhere, as well as share and work on documents with others online, even simultaneously. They are entirely web-based and available via Windows Live, so there's no additional software to download or install. They can be used from virtually any computer whether or not it has Microsoft Office installed. 

LICENSING, SECURITY AND RELIABILITY

IL: Where do you see Microsoft moving from a licensing perspective for its software products as the industry moves towards cloud-hosted collaboration, and a pricing model based on a per user annual fee?

NT: Currently, existing Enterprise Agreements make it difficult to accommodate additional users and honestly present complex scenarios when user counts fluctuate. With Microsoft Online Services, firms can acquire licenses based on the number of months they need access (think summer associates) and how many new users they want added and for how long. This creates a new level of flexibility that did not previously exist. Still, stable user environments provide more economic licensing solutions since there is more predictability at play. All of these scenarios are addressed as part of Microsoft’s service provider licensing agreements (SPLA). 

IL: How will cloud solutions satisfy lawyers on security, confidentiality and return of data?

NT: This is a very valid and formidable concern and dictates different solutions based on geographies and local laws. For example, German law will not allow documents to leave Germany if your client is the government so how could you adhere to these requirements in a cloud scenario? Microsoft provides options for dedicated data centers for Microsoft Online Services to ensure that clients know where their documents are being stored. There is also premise security – the concept of controlling the physical premises where the document resides. Matter security, which is a really big deal in legal, also takes into account the potential need for ethical firewalls, to protect data from potential conflict scenarios within the firm.

IL: How does Microsoft’s 99.9% availability guarantee differ from others and what do you offer clients during downtime? 

NT: Microsoft’s guarantee states that if you incur any downtime we will repay you financially versus giving you additional service time. Our standard guaranteed reliability is 99.9%, with no minimum number of consecutive minutes of downtime required in order to be considered downtime. To us, a minute of downtime is downtime. There’s no minimum threshold. In some industries such as banking or finance, customers will pay extra for extreme reliability (referred to as the four “9’s” of uptime guarantees). In legal, Outlook and Exchange would fall into this mission critical category as well. 

OFFICE 2010/ONLINE SERVICES LEGAL CLIENT DRILL DOWN

IL: Who does Microsoft see as its ideal law firm client for the Office 2010 Online Services offering?

NT: Any firm that has a heavy reliance on messaging and data storage with concerns about eDiscovery/client confidentiality coupled with the managerial challenges that come from broad geographic dispersion. This means a lot of the U.K.’s Magic Circle firms are showing more interest in Online Services at the moment than some U.S. firms are. Typical firms would have major storage requirements and look to offload all that data to a trustworthy source enabling them to focus on how their users interact with their desktops.

IL: In a recent interview with CNN Money, Stephen Elop (President of Microsoft Business Division) stated that over 8.6 million people were testing Office 2010 prior to release. How large is your beta testing initiative in legal?

NT: We had three large law firms in our Technology Adoption Program (TAP) for SharePoint 2010 and Office 2010 and two in the Exchange 2010 TAP program including a Global 20 firm that was part of the Online Services beta for the 2010 release. There are a lot of on-ramps to early adoption including the product design stage, early alpha, beta, and public preview stage. The difficulty in legal in terms of Online Services adoption is the nature of the heavily customized desktop combined with the perception that cloud computing means "all or nothing." While many firms have outsourced their document repositories or messaging archives, there are currently no AmLaw 200 firms running their entire Exchange, SharePoint or SQL workloads in the cloud using Online Services. In a year from now, we expect that to be a very different story. We have already started with Wave 15 (new version of Office) planning and have technicians sitting with firms to better understand their content management and specifically e-mail management needs.

IL: According to Elop, Office’s #1 competitor is previous versions of Office – that seems especially true in legal where change takes time and upgrades are often a wait and see decision. How are you addressing this ingrained hesitation and what are you communicating to the skeptics who’d rather let somebody else go first?

NT: With the Windows 7 and SharePoint and Office 2010 releases, change management has been less of an issue. We are actually getting pulled forward by law firms instead of the other way around. Their requests are actually helping us understand what the benefits of our platform are – both on premise and in the cloud – and telling us what aspects of the solutions need to be addressed as they migrate rapidly. Our technology partners are integral in the product planning phases so they are collectively helping us with end user adoption just as we help them with their compatibility issues. At the point of launch, it has been less of a show and tell about what the product can do and more about moving forward with what we have already proven can be accomplished in the legal technology community.

FUTURES & PREDICTIONS

IL: Do you see the end of traditional desktop software suites for law firms? What does the legal desktop look like in 10 or 20 years from now?

NT: In the future, Microsoft sees three screens; the desktop, mobile device, and TV, with a seamless environment across all of them. No matter where you are, you’ll have access to the same functionality and features. We call this “continuous services.” It will be less about what the legal desktop looks like but more important to understand how lawyers and their clients want to work now, in the future, and how Microsoft can support them. Here are some predictions: Will we be getting away from word processors? Absolutely not. Will we start to collaborate differently? I think we will. Will we store and file things differently? Probably. Will we continue to differentiate between records management and document management? No, here we are already seeing the lines blurring. Will it matter what repository things are kept in? No, this will become increasingly virtual and abstract. Instead, the focus will be on access. It’s less about what the screen looks like but more about the working behavior, how much is verbal, how much is touch and how will the graphical user interface evolve to a natural user interface? I think Bill Gates is right, we’ll be able to interact with our computer more verbally, which will understand us better and emulate predictive behaviors and know our standards and requirements. 

In terms of futures, more and more firms are embracing "blue sky thinking" rather than confining themselves to the next dot-rev of their DMS, and taking the blinders off when it comes to what can be done. Increasingly, clients are asking what the law firms are using so you can say many firms have leapfrogged and shed their former "technology laggard" labels. 

Editor's Note: Disruptions welcome. The bigger point is that the new opportunities afforded by cloud computing and the increasing willingness for all participants to embrace the possibilities, points toward a very bright future. Software giants like Microsoft can continue to supply core applications, but at the same time really push the envelope when it comes to new developments such as cloud offerings and natural user interfaces; technology partners can tap into the development platforms like Windows Azure to develop new offerings for completely new target markets, and law firms who previously had to work with disparate, incompatible systems and were relegated to leveraging old technology, are now embracing collaborative cloud alternatives. Finally, law firm clients, who really turned up the pressure on their outside counsel to share information and automate processes, are recognizing that some firms are leveraging technology to help them and their corporate clients more effectively compete.

If you have comments on this piece or questions for Norm, please email us.

RELATED RESOURCES

Posted in "In Their Own Words" Spotlights, Future of Law Firm, Legal Industry, Thought Leadership, Vendors | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment